While many medical efforts have focused on increasing access and use of epinephrine, a powerful, often life-saving allergy medication, to ethnic, racial, and socioeconomic groups that have been shown to suffer from lack of access to this important drug, recent efforts have also emphasized the importance of research that clarifies differences in allergy incidence among different racial and ethnic groups. Indeed, it seems that those of different races and ethnicities may be prone to different allergies or allergy severities. Given the distinct genetic makeup of those of different such demographics, this insight is perhaps not that surprising. Racial differences in disorders related to allergy, such as asthma and atopic dermatitis, also make the idea that there are racial differences in allergy susceptibility quite intuitive.
Of particular concern is the rise of allergies that has occurred over recent years. Given that the specific change in allergy incidence has varied by race, it seems reasonable to assume that there are differences in racial vulnerabilities to allergens. One study found that the incidence of allergies increased about 1.0% in whites individuals between 1988 and 2011. The study found that during the same period, Hispanics suffered a 1.2% increase in allergy incidence, whereas non-Hispanic blacks suffered a 2.1% increase in allergy incidence.
So what are the differences in allergies among different ethnic and racial groups? Some data suggests that African American children are more prone to food allergies than those of other groups. Among black children, black boys appear particularly at risk for some of the most common food allergies, such as allergies to milk, soy, eggs, shellfish, and peanuts. A study conducted by the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) found that Hispanic children, on the other hand, are less likely to suffer from food allergies than children of other ethnicities.
It has also been shown that Chinese people are less likely to demonstrate allergies to peanuts than are Americans. However, the difference in incidence in allergies in these groups has been suggested to be due to different cooking techniques generally used by these distinct groups. Supporting this idea are the results of a United States government study that found that boiled or fried peanuts, which are often found in Chinese cuisine, are less likely to cause allergies than the roasted peanuts often found in the United States.
Though more research will be needed to clarify how race impacts allergen vulnerability, healthcare professionals emphasize the importance of knowing what you are ingesting to avoid allergic reactions. The differences in cuisine associated with different races, ethnicities, and cultures can pose a problem for allergy sufferers because it is not always transparent what ingredients are in certain dishes.
Asian food incorporates a significant amount of the most common food allergens such as shellfish, eggs, peanuts, and soy. Thai food is particularly peanut-heavy. One challenge for those with peanut allergies is the difference in cooking technique. For instance, fried egg rolls and spring rolls are often sealed with peanut butter, but a menu would not necessarily include the information that peanut butter is included in the dish. Those unfamiliar with Asian cuisine may therefore experience increased vulnerability to allergies when dining on Asian food.
Another common issue with Asian cuisine is cross-contamination. The woks that are traditionally used in Asian cooking are often not cleaned between different cooking sessions because the buildup of food over time can act as a seasoning that flavors the food. Thus, though someone who is allergic to shellfish may order a meat dish, their meat may be cooked in a wok that recently housed shrimp, thereby leading to an allergic reaction. Nonetheless, the soy sauce that is used in Asian cooking often does not affect those with soy allergies because the soy proteins have been broken down by the time the sauce is created.
French food contains a number of allergens, including nuts, seed oils, and dairy products. One thing that can be particularly dangerous for nut and seed allergy sufferers is that the French often hand-press oils from these ingredients, and these types of oils tend to have more of the nut protein in them than oils found in other cuisines. Thus, those who think they can tolerate certain oils may be surprised by their reaction to those oils when they are found in French food.
Italian food can cause problems for a number of different allergy sufferers. Those with wheat allergies often have a difficult time with Italian food because of the amount of bread and pasta incorporated in this type of cuisine. Italian food also includes a good amount of dairy. Sauces, such as pesto, also contain nuts.
Indian food is made up largely of spices that tend to be safe for most people with allergies. However, those allergic to dairy products and nuts should use caution when eating creamy curries, pre-prepared teas, or Indian desserts, such as kheer. Mexican food is similarly filled with spices and often safe. However, some sauces used in Mexican cooking contain nuts.
Though cultural aspects of different race’s food tendencies can raise allergy issues, it is becoming an increasingly popular idea that people of different races may in fact have different susceptibilities to certain allergens. Research focused on identifying these differences may help different demographics protect themselves against the allergies to which they are particularly vulnerable.
People who work with laboratory animals are susceptible to developing allergies to the specimens to which they are regularly subjected, a condition termed laboratory animal allergy, or LAA. Lung function and changes in the immune system have been identified in a number of such workers, and it is believed that between about 1 in 3 to 1 in 5 of those who regularly work with animals will develop these allergies within 2 years. However, females appear to be more vulnerable to developing these animal allergies than are males. People with higher levels of immunoglobulin E, an antibody involved in fighting off parasites, are also more likely to develop LAA. From an environmental standpoint, it seems that the more hours that workers tend to spend with laboratory animals, the more likely they are to develop allergies. The most common symptom is rhinitis, which involves inflammation of the nose, but asthma also often develops in these workers.
There are a number of animals that cause allergy problems in those working in laboratories. Some of the most often cited are rodents, cockroaches, and squirrel monkeys. Though people often associate fur and dander with allergies, people tend to react more to proteins in animals' urine. Major urinary proteins (Mups) are the culprit for many LAA cases and can lead to the development of asthma. One study found that over 65% of laboratory workers who had developed asthma while working in their laboratory displayed antibodies to Rat n 1, which, like Mup13, is a human allergen found in rodent urine .Because urine and its associated proteins are often embedded in animals' hair and fur, the presence or lingering of that hair or fur can cause allergic reactions.
Allergies and asthma tend to be especially problematic for workers whose work environment does not have effective mechanisms for controlling the presence of allergens. For instance, when laboratories are not engineered to eliminate allergens, do not involve administrative guidelines for manually doing so, or do not require that protective equipment is used or worn, the workers within those laboratories are more likely to develop allergies and asthma. Interestingly, rabbits appear to lead to the highest rates of allergy symptoms than any other laboratory animal. Rabbits do tend to spray their urine as a means for communication and also to shed more fur than other animals, which may account for their higher likelihood of leading to allergies.
LAA can pose a number of challenges for workers. It can make them less efficient at work and even jeopardize their professional career if they are eventually forced to abandon their area of research. The psychological impact can be significant, as workers worry not only about their health but also about the uncertainty regarding their career paths. Lifestyle can also be adversely affected, with many of those suffering from LAA experiencing chronic itching, watery eyes, cough, and shortness of breath. These symptoms can make not only work activities, but other personal activities, such as hobbies and exercise, difficult to participate in.
The most serious consequences associated with LAA are of course related to health. The onset of allergies and asthma can be both severe and sudden, making them quite dangerous. Workers can suffer anaphylactic shock, which is potentially fatal. Even if they avoid anaphylactic shock, the development of complications related to allergies, such as asthma, tend to worsen health outcomes over the lifespan.
The scientific community has not focused a lot of attention or resources on the issue of LAA to date, though there are a number of cases of famous scientists suffering from such allergies. Barbara McClintock, a Nobel Prize winning geneticist developed an allergy to corn flowers, whereas Orley Taylor, an ecology at the University of Kansas developed an allergy to sulfur butterflies over the course of a decade. However, given what is known about LAA, there are some things that can be done to minimize its occurrence or to reduce the suffering experienced by those who develop it. The most critical component of LAA is exposure to allergens. Thus, any strategy that reduces this exposure should also reduce allergic reactions and symptoms. As more hours spent with animals is known to increase the chances of developing LAA, reducing the number of hours that are physically spent with the laboratory animals each week can help reduce allergies and asthma. Institution-wide measures can also significantly help the problem of LAA. By implementing filtering systems that rid the laboratory air of allergens, for example, can greatly improve air quality and reduce the burden on laboratory workers' immune systems. Requiring that protective gear, such as face masks, gloves, or body suits, are worn can have a similar effect.
People often wonder if their loving pets are susceptible to the same allergies that they are. Though our pets are less likely to suffer from the same symptoms that we do when we experience allergies, they are in fact vulnerable to allergies. Allergies occur in pets for the same reason they occur in us – their immune systems recognize certain substances as harmful, even though they may not actually be threatening. Pets usually do not show symptoms of allergies until they are between one and three years old, and when it comes to dogs, females are more likely to display allergy symptoms than males. Certain dog breeds are also more susceptible to allergies than others. Breeds with flat faces, such as pugs, bulldogs, and Boston terriers are more likely to suffer from allergies than breeds with longer snouts. Retrievers and setters are also particularly vulnerable to allergies.
There are a number of signs that can help you confirm whether your pet suffers from allergies. However, it is important to keep in mind that animals’ allergy symptoms are often quite distinct from human allergy symptoms. Whereas we are likely to have itchy, watery eyes and runny noses, our pets are more likely to experience irritation of the skin when exposed to environmental allergens. Though they may sneeze while experiencing allergies, pets are not likely to sneeze or cough like we often do when our allergies act up but instead are likely to be found scratching or licking their ears, eyes, or skin when allergies attack. Skin near their tails is often irritated when animals suffer from allergies. You may also notice red or scabbed skin on pets suffering from allergies, which could result from chronic scratching.
In addition to allergies that tend to be seasonal, our pets, like us, may also be allergic to certain foods. Symptoms associated with food allergies are more likely to resemble our own symptoms to food allergies. Vomiting, diarrhea, and an inflamed throat are likely to occur in your pet if they have ingested a food to which they are allergic. This type of allergy may require more immediate medical attention than seasonal allergies.
Seasonally, our pets are often allergic to pollens, dust, mold, perfumes, cleaning products, rubber, and plastic – just like we are – but also often succumb to flea saliva. Prescription drugs and certain foods, such as beef, chicken, pork, wheat, soy, and corn can also cause allergic reactions when ingested at any time. Though the severity of symptoms associated with food allergies are not likely to go unnoticed for long, it is also important to recognize seasonal allergies in our pets because the scratching that tends to occur while our pets suffer from these allergies can lead to bleeding to infection. Animals can also suffer secondary infections, such as yeast or bacterial infections, which can lead to significant discomfort.
Veterinarians can do allergy tests to determine if your pet experiences allergies, and if so, to what your pet may be allergic. Intradermal skin tests, like those used in people, are a common way to identify pet allergies to environmental allergens. Food allergies are more laborious to diagnose, usually requiring a special 3-month protein diet. Animal doctors can also provide treatments for these allergies, including allergy shots, or immunotherapies, which act much like allergy treatments that people use. There are also specific dietary supplements that have been shown to help allergy symptoms. Other treatment options include antihistamines, antibiotics, and corticosteroids.
There are a number of preventative measures that can also be taken to reduce the chances that your pets suffer from allergies, or to minimize their discomfort when allergies do strike. Bathing your pets regularly can rid them of irritating allergens. Cleaning pets’ bedding and vacuuming regularly are other effective ways of eliminating allergens from your pets’ environments. Using unscented litter that is dust-free can help minimize allergies in cats. Preventative flea medications can protect pets from common flea allergies. Many veterinarians suggest topical or oral flea medications be taken regularly, or at least during seasons when fleas are likely to be a problem in your area. Removing the potential allergen is the most effective way to prevent allergies in animals, just as in people.
It is common for people to be allergic to pollen, and to know that pollen irritates them. What is less well recognized is that there are a number of types of pollen, which peak at different times in the year and cause distinct symptoms for allergy sufferers. Having a precise understanding of the causes of one’s allergies can significantly increase the ability to manage symptoms, so learning the differences among allergens from various plants can be extremely useful for allergy sufferers.
A first step for allergy sufferers is to be tested for allergies to try to pinpoint which particular allergens irritate them. Once those allergens are identified, people can learn about when and where those allergens are likely to strike and take the necessary precautions to avoid exposure to those allergens. Below is some information on when different pollen types are likely to impact you. Because even allergy tests cannot always determine your particular allergies, paying attention to when you find yourself suffering from allergies can help you figure out what your immune system may be reacting to.
If you notice your allergies toward the beginning of the calendar year, you may be suffering from alder pollen, hazel pollen, or yew pollen, all of which are being released at the year’s start and lasting into April.
If your allergies begin early in the year, but not in January, elm pollen or willow pollen could be to blame.
If you notice that your allergies do not start until March or later and tend to be “spring allergies,” one of the following pollen types could be causing your symptoms:
One or more of the following plant types may plague those who find that their symptoms are particularly bad during summer months.
If you notice that your nose is running all year long, you are likely allergic to something that is around longer than the pollens mentioned above. Pets, mites, mold, or dust could be the culprit. Mold allergies tend to be most noticeable in fall and spring, a big sign of mold allergies is that symptoms are worse indoors than outdoors. Similarly, dust allergies are worse indoors and tend to peak in the winter. Central heat can be a major contributor to dust allergies. One thing to be aware of is that your sniffling is likely not from a food allergy. Though about 30% of people believe they suffer from a food allergy, only about 3% of the population actually suffers from such allergies. Further, if an allergy occurs as a result of ingestion, symptoms are usually much different than those that occur with the allergens we have discussed here.
Though people often feel that their allergies get worse every year, it is not highly likely that seasonal allergies get worse over time. It is true, however, that the severity of allergies varies from year to year. Predicting how bad an allergy season will be is difficult because individual weather events can have a significant impact on allergens. The weather, for instance, largely contributes to how long and how strong an allergy season is. Hot, dry summers and harsh, cold winters often inhibit the growth of tree and flower buds in, which can reduce symptoms for those who suffer from hay fever, or allergies to grass. Further, just because an allergy season may start earlier does not mean it may end earlier. Weather can produce a longer allergy season.
Rain is an interesting contributor to seasonal allergies, as it can both exacerbate and improve allergy symptoms, depending on the context. Rain in the spring may get rid of pollen from trees, minimizing the effect of that pollen on allergy sufferers. Nonetheless, the longer-term impact of the rain could be improved conditions for grasses and weeds to grow in the summer, enhancing the pollen in the air throughout the summer months and wreaking havoc on the immune systems of those with relevant allergies. Pollen and ragweed, which are late summer allergens, are some of the most problematic allergy triggers. Thus, though spring rain may seem wonderful in April, the impact it has on those with allergies in the summer may outweigh the spring benefits. However, if winter was particularly harsh, the rain from spring may not be enough to ensure a lot of pollen in the air in the summer. Thus, the best weather for minimizing allergy symptoms may be a long, cold winter and a rainy spring.
Trees can also have both a negative or positive impact on allergies. Though they can act as natural filters that remove pollutants from the air, some studies have shown that higher exposure to tree pollen increases the chances of developing an allergy to the pollen. The spacing of trees can also improve allergy conditions. When trees are concentrated too heavily in certain areas, the amount of pollen in the air can reach levels that are going to adversely affect those with pollen allergies. It therefore may be that there is an ideal balance in tree density, and the type and distribution of trees, to minimize allergies in a given area.
Research that aids in our understanding of allergies can help us to improve allergy severity over time. For instance, research suggests that a great number of plant species is better for our health. Thus, by strategically breeding and planting plants, we can design environments that are more amenable to low levels of allergies. Certain plants, such as the dawn redwood, the hawthorn, and the tulip poplar, have lower allergy potentials than other plants. Further, insect pollinated plants do not bloom as long as wind=pollinated plants and so are also better for allergies. Insect plants’ pollen is also stickier, preventing it from traveling easily through the air.
Another issue for allergy sufferers is that in many places, there is a disproportionate amount of male trees. The problem with having more male trees is that the males are the ones that produce pollen. Female trees are better for allergies than are male trees not only because they do not produce pollen, but female trees also filter pollen from the air by trapping pollen particles. Thus, by increasing the proportion of female trees, we could reap the benefits of trees while minimizing the amount of pollen in the air.
Certain cities are capitalizing on research to try to reduce allergies. For instance, Albuquerque, Las Vegas, and Tucson do not allow extremely allergenic plants like mulberries and olive trees to be planted. Of course, because many of these trees are already present, it could take years for these trees to die and for people to reap the benefits of lower numbers of these allergy-inducing plants.
Though it may not be possible for general citizens to impact the specific types and distributions of trees in their local area, there are strategies individuals can take to minimize exposure to pollen and reduce the impact of allergies during years that are particularly conducive to allergy problems. For instance, implementing preventative measures, such as seeing a doctor and taking proper medications before allergy symptoms occur is a good way to shield yourself from allergies in tougher seasons or years. Keeping yourself and your belongings indoors and showering at night when pollen levels can help. Keeping only plants that are allergy friendly, such as bamboo palm, ficus, English ivy, and peace lilies is another good strategy to minimize allergy symptoms.
With the growing incidence of peanut allergies and the consequent deaths that are often reported on the news, many parents instinctively avoid feeding their children peanuts, assuming that the nuts may cause an adverse and scary reaction in their kids. Even doctors themselves have been known to urge parents to refrain from exposing their babies to peanuts. In 2000, the American Academy of Pediatrics specifically advised parents to avoid feeding their babies peanuts if they were at risk for allergies.
Groundbreaking research conducted over the past five years and finally published paints a new picture of how this intuitive reaction to the growing issue of peanut allergies may actually exacerbate the problem. A study published earlier this year in one of the most respected medical journals, the New England Journal of Medicine reported that exposing babies to peanut products reduces the risk of peanut allergy by 70-86% in those infants at high risk for developing the allergy. The researchers conducting the study, led by Dr. Gideon Lack, presented their findings at the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma, & Immunology (AAAI) conference in Houston in February.
For their study, the researchers tested the idea that regularly eating peanuts during the first year of life would protect against the development of peanut allergies by allowing the immune system to get used to peanuts. The idea for the study stemmed from observations that Jewish children in Israel develop peanut allergies 10 times less frequently than do those in England – and also start eating peanuts much earlier in life, usually before they are a year old. Other motivations for the study were the observations that early introduction of eggs and milk could reduce the development of allergies to these products, often also associated with food allergy. Because these observations were merely observations – and not controlled studies, the researchers wanted to design studies that would allow them to collect meaningful data on the effects of early exposure to allergens on the later development of relevant allergies.
The investigators tested their idea on over 600 infants, ranging from 4 months to 11 months in age. All of these infants were categorized as high risk due to egg allergy, eczema, or both. Approximately half of the children served as a control and were kept away from peanuts, whereas the other half were given snacks containing peanuts three or more times each week until they were five years old. When these children were tested for peanut allergies at the age of 5, only 3.2% of those who ate peanut snacks as babies had developed peanut allergies, compared to 17.2% of those in the group that did not ingest peanuts as babies.
The Food Allergy Research and Education (FARE), an institution dedicated to improving the quality of life and treatment options for those suffering from food allergies, funded this critical research study. Their CEO, James Baker, importantly pointed out at the meeting that the specific timing of initial peanut exposure can significantly impact the likelihood of developing a peanut allergy. FARE also emphasized that these results should not be interpreted to mean that older children and adults who are already diagnosed with peanut allergies should expose themselves to peanuts as a way to cure themselves of the allergy. Though techniques in this spirit are often used therapeutically, in strategies known as immunotherapies, these therapies should be administered and monitored by physicians. While some reports have noted that the World Health Organization (WHO) may be incorrect in recommending that people avoid peanuts if they are allergic, those with peanut allergies do still need to use significant precautions around peanuts. Indeed, the study excluded babies who already showed signs of peanut allergies and so does not offer data on how peanut exposure affects existing allergies.
Though the results of the study on the impact of early peanut exposure to the later development of peanut allergies is striking and highly promising in terms of our growing understanding of peanut allergies and how to protect against them, as with any influential scientific study, the results may open up more questions than they answer. First, will these protected children continue to be protected against peanut allergies later in life and into adulthood? Future research programs aim to track these children to answer that question.
More research will also need to be conducted to determine the optimal exposure dose and timing so that we can best leverage our ability to prevent peanut allergy development and potentially alter guidelines accordingly. For now, the results provide relevant physicians with new data and opportunities for helping their patients avoid the detriments of peanut allergies. With time, we may know enough about the development of peanut allergies to make general recommendations for all parents to follow.
Around 5.4 million people suffer from peanut allergies in the United States and Europe alone. Among those with peanut allergies are millions of children, who, along with their parents, have to deal with the anxiety that comes with these allergies on a daily basis. Peanuts are the biggest culprits for food allergies, with approximately 8% of American children being diagnosed with the allergy. As a society, we are impacted not only by the death that can result from severe allergies and anaphylactic reactions but also by the reduced quality of life associated with dealing with such allergies. The psychological impact of allergies on patients and their families can lead to severe anxiety and antisocial behavior.
The incidence of this specific allergy does not seem to be declining, or even remaining steady. Instead, one study shows that four times more children had peanut allergies by 2010 than in 1997. Another pair of studies, conducted in the Unites States and The United Kingdom, shows that in the past five years, peanut allergies have doubled in kids younger than five years of age.
Today, between 150 and 200 deaths occur each year in the United States as a result of peanut allergies, and around 125,000 emergency room visits result from allergic reactions related to peanuts. It is possible for children to outgrow their peanut allergies, but research suggests that this occurs only about 20% of the time. Though the number of individuals with peanut allergies may not be improving, medical interventions to improve outcomes associated with these allergies seem to be.
A pharmaceutical company based in France has developed a drug (Viaskin Peanut) that may offer a solution for the families impacted by the growing incidence of peanut allergies and improve the economic impact of these allergies on our healthcare system.
Viaskin Peanut, created by DBV Technologies, is delivered in the form of a patch and has been accepted into the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA)’s expedited approval program. The program, also known as a fast-track program, has less stringent testing requirements for allowing drugs onto the market.
What this means for consumers is reduced waiting time before they can access the drug. Viaskin Peanut should begin Phase III trials this year and become available in the United States in early 2018. It has already been shown that some peanut allergy patients using the patch can eat about four peanuts without suffering allergic consequences.
DBV Technologies is not the only company attempting to create products that can help people who are allergic to peanuts. A United States company, Aimmune Therapeutics, which used to be called the Allergen Research Corporation, is developing a drug, AR101, which would be offered in pill form to desensitize patients to peanuts. Like DBV Technologies, Aimmune Therapeutics has also been accepted into the fast-track approval program by the FDA and plans to start Phase III trials before the end of 2015. Aimmune Therapeutics is also looking into creating interventions for other types of food allergies.
How do these new solutions addressing peanut allergies work? Unlike conventional treatment options, like antihistamines and EpiPens, which aim to reduce the effects of an immune reaction on the body, effectively minimizing the symptoms associated with severe allergic reactions, Viaskin Peanut and AR101 attempt to intervene much earlier along in the process of an allergic reaction. These drugs introduce small amounts of peanut products to the patient, with the goal of desensitizing the patient’s immune system to peanuts. In other words, rather than intervening in the immune reaction, these new drugs are designed to prevent the reaction from occurring in the first place. This strategy for dealing with allergies is known as immunotherapy and is growing in popularity.
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) continues to warn that there is no cure for food allergies. Though the drugs currently being tested and potentially commercialized may improve things for peanut allergy sufferers, they do not claim to cure patients of their allergies or to 100% prevent or stop immune reactions to peanuts. Thus, even if these drugs do soon hit shelves, doctors are likely to continue to recommend that those with peanut allergies take precautions for preventing exposure to these nuts, particularly high-dose exposures. Such exposure can occur, for instance, when prescription drugs containing peanut oil are ingested. Nonetheless, if these drugs are able to minimize the adverse impact of peanut allergies, they are likely to significantly improve millions of lives.
When we think of treating allergies, we often think of pills, inhalers, nasal drops, and EpiPens. However, preventing allergies can be one of the most effective ways to deal with them. Because there are no cures or vaccines currently available for allergies, prevention generally requires controlling one’s environment. For instance, those with food allergies are advised to avoid exposure to problematic foods. Those allergic to indoor and outdoor allergens, such as pollen and dust mites, can also reduce the impact of those allergens on their bodies by employing measures to decrease the levels of those allergens to which they are exposed.
For those with allergies, it has often been recommended that vacuum regularly can improve allergy symptoms by getting rid of allergy triggers like dust mites. Some people suggest keeping windows closed when outdoor allergens are at high levels, minimizing the use of window fans because they pull pollen from outdoors indoors, and to vacuum two or more times per week. Vacuuming is recommended because it is one effective way to keep floors clean, and though not always well recognized, dusty and dirty floors are often primary culprits for indoor allergies. Some people also recommend leaving shoes at the door, to minimize the dirt and dust that accumulates on floors in the first place. Nonetheless, whether shoes are worn indoors or not, dust will naturally occur, and it will need to be removed. Unlike vacuuming, sweeping actually stirs up dust and can therefore exacerbate allergies. Vacuuming is thus recommended as the best way to keep floors clean and allergen-free.
Though vacuuming is a great way to reduce indoor allergens, experts specify that vacuum cleaners will be most effective if they contain a high efficient particulate air (HEPA) filter because these filters are superior at pulling in dust particles. When vacuum cleaners with HEPA filters are used, filters need to be changed approximately every six months and should be changed outdoors so that the trapped dust particles are not released back into the indoor space.
Some recent research studies suggest that rather than improving allergy symptoms, vacuums can in fact make those symptoms worse. Careful inspection of the details of the research reveals that a key issue in whether vacuum cleaners help or exacerbate allergies is the vacuum mechanism – or how the vacuum cleaner works. Some vacuum cleaners, including those with HEPA filters, actually release tiny dust particles and bacteria into the air, which can cause allergies or infections.
A comprehensive study on air emissions of different vacuum cleaners was conducted in Australia, and its results were published in the journal Environmental Science & Technology. After inspecting 21 different vacuum cleaners, the researchers concluded that every single vacuum cleaner released allergens and bacteria into the air. However, there were differences in the extent to which the vacuums did so. Generally, newer and more expensive models polluted the indoor air less than did older and cheaper models. Additionally, though it is claimed that HEPA filters remove 99.9% of bacteria and allergens like pollen from the environment, cleaners with HEPA filters released only slightly less of these substances than did cleaners that lacked HEPA filters.
Despite these findings, experts conclude that vacuum cleaners are still a good way to remove allergens from the environment. Specifically, they claim that a vacuum cleaner would have be extremely old and dirty to do more harm than good in minimizing allergens and reducing allergy symptoms. As far as HEPA filters go, regardless of the precise amount of allergens they are able to remove, it is clear that they remove more of these allergens than are removed without the use of these filters, and it is thus recommended that people continue to employ these filters to get rid of environmental allergens.
When recommending ways to reduce exposure to allergens, there are other recommendations related to cleaning as well. For instance, living in homes with hard wood floors is recommended over homes with carpet. For those with rugs in the home, cleaning the rugs weekly to remove dust and dirt particles can significantly improve allergy symptoms in the home. In addition, using microfiber, rather than paper towels or other types of cloths, can more effectively rid surfaces of irritating dust particles. Because microfiber cloths have small microfibers, they are able to cling to dirt and dust particles in small areas or cracks, which is difficult to achieve with other types of cloths. An added benefit is that to achieve good results, microfiber cloths can be used on their own, or with water, rather than with chemicals that can themselves act as irritants or allergens.
When microfiber cloths are used, it is critical to dust past the end of surfaces, or else dust and dirt will accumulate at the edges of surfaces that are being cleaned. One common suggestion for microfiber cloths is to use them after showering to clean surfaces in the shower and bathroom. This practice reduces moisture and prevents the growth of mold and mildew, which are common allergy triggers. Leaving the door open or keeping the shower curtain partially open can also decrease moisture accumulation by allowing air to flow into the shower rather than trapping moisture inside.
For people allergic to environmental agents like pollen and dust mites, reducing the levels of these allergens to which they are exposed can be a highly effective way to manage allergies and allergy symptoms. Vacuum cleaners can minimize the amount of both indoor and outdoor allergens that are present inside, particularly if they incorporate HEPA filters, which are capable of removing these allergens at high rates.
Before puberty, boys tend to suffer from allergies and asthma more frequently than do girls. However, after puberty, these conditions are more common in women than in men. Women who suffer from acute asthma, which is related to allergies, are 60% more likely than men to require emergency intervention or hospitalization. Further, women suffer more frequent and more severe anaphylaxis, which is a potentially fatal severe allergic reaction that can inhibit a patient’s ability to breathe and lead to stroke. Researchers have wondered for years why the sex difference in tendency to experience anaphylaxis exists, and recent research points to a potential role of estrogen.
Estrogen refers to the main female sex hormones, which are critical in female reproduction and menstrual cycles. Estrogen promotes female characteristics, such as the growth of breasts, and also serves a number of critical physiological functions. Estrogen is used medically for a number of purposes, including birth control (it is contained in oral contraceptives), hormone replacement therapy, and the treatment of certain cancers, such as breast and prostate cancer.
Researchers at the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), which is one of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) published their relevant findings in The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology. The researchers showed that when exposed to allergens, female mice endured longer and more severe anaphylaxis than did male mice. However, when estrogen levels were reduced in female mice, the sex differences disappeared.
To do this experiment, researchers ovariectomized the female mice, meaning they removed their ovaries. Because ovaries produce estrogen, this procedure minimizes the amount of estrogen circulating in female mice’s bodies. They then compared allergic reactions and anaphylaxis in male mice, regular female mice, and female mice lacking ovaries.
To induce anaphylaxis, the researchers used histamine, which is a natural component of the immune system that causes inflammation, combined with immunoglobulins, or antibodies that initiate allergic reactions when stimulated. Not only did the female mice that lacked ovaries display anaphylactic reactions that were more similar to their male counterparts than did non-ovariectomized female mice, but when researchers injected an estrogen hormone called estradiol into these ovariectomized mice, the mice also suffered more severe anaphylaxis. These results point to a clear role of estrogen in promoting more severe allergic reactions.
After recognizing that estrogen is a key player in allergic reactions and in their severity, researchers asked what it is about estrogen that allows it to exacerbate anaphylaxis. A set of experiments then led to the discovery that estrogen enhances the swelling and blood vessel dilation associated with anaphylaxis because it increases the activity of endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS), which is an enzyme that causes these symptoms. When researchers blocked eNOS activity in female mice, they again observed the disappearance of sex differences in allergic reactions and anaphylaxis.
It is important to note that these studies were conducted in mice, and so it is not yet clear whether the findings apply to humans as well. Because neither physicians nor scientists can ethically induce anaphylaxis in human patients, nor can they remove ovaries in human patients for the sake of experimentation, studies parallel to those conducted in mice cannot be recapitulated in humans. However, additional experimentation is likely to help confirm whether these findings in mice do in fact extend to humans.
Though removing the ovaries of mice to understand the impact of estrogen on different physiological reactions is arguably reasonable for scientific research, it is highly unlikely that female patients with severe allergies would want to remove their ovaries or deplete their systems of estrogen. Thus, the finding that estrogen exacerbates allergic reactions helps us understand the difference in reactions in men and women but does not provide a practical treatment option.
It does, however, provide a useful lesson to females with severe allergies. Namely, it is especially important to avoid allergens and to carry an EpiPen when estrogen levels are high. Estrogen levels are high throughout puberty, just before menstruation, or when estrogen is being used for medical purposes. For example, women undergoing hormone replacement therapy following menopause may be at higher risk for anaphylactic reactions than those who do not undergo hormone replacement therapy. On the other hand, parents of young girls can rest assured that when their daughters are pre-pubescent, their estrogen levels are low, making them less susceptible to anaphylaxis than they may be later in life.
However, the finding that estrogen imparts its effect on allergies by specifically increasing the activity of a certain enzyme – i.e. eNOS – provides a more promising route to treatment. For instance, medications may be developed that specifically inhibit the activity of eNOS in those who suffer severe allergic reactions or anaphylaxis.
It is clear that adult women are more susceptible to severe allergic reactions and complications arising from asthma than are adult men. New research helps clarify the existence of sex differences by demonstrating the key role of estrogen in promoting more severe reactions. By increasing the activity of eNOS, estrogen indirectly enhances swelling and inflammation, which are dangerous characteristics of anaphylaxis. Understanding the critical role of both estrogen and eNOS can enable patients to employ more effective strategies to prevent severe allergic reactions and anaphylaxis and also open up doors to the development of more effective allergy treatment options. Specifically, medications that are able to block eNOS activity may be a particularly powerful way to help women with severe allergies experience fewer or less severe anaphylactic reactions.
We often associate weather with our allergy symptoms because certain seasons bring with them specific allergens that trigger our sneezing, runny noses, and wheezing. Often, the causes for our allergies are agents that thrive in certain weather conditions. For instance, mold grows in the winter, poison ivy is rampant in the summer, and pollen fills the air in the spring and fall. However, sometimes it is the weather itself that makes us suffer form allergies.
Specifically, changes in temperature and humidity can cause allergy symptoms like sneezing and congestion, which occur due to swelling that results from changes in the nose’s membranes. These types of symptoms are generally referred to as non-allergic rhinitis. Other weather specific conditions, however, are allergic reactions rather than non-allergic reactions. For instance, cold urticaria is an actual allergic reaction to cold weather.
Those who experience cold urticarial suffer from itching and swelling when they are exposed to cold air. People often get cold urticaria as a result of a viral infection, while others are born with the issue. Though symptoms are usually more annoying than dangerous, severe reactions can cause anaphylaxis and therefore be life threatening, so some patients with cold urticaria are advised to carry an EpiPen. Lucky patients will outgrow the condition and no longer suffer the associated symptoms.
Many allergy sufferers who do not have cold urticaria still feel as though they are allergic to the weather because of the weather’s impact on their allergies. Each season brings with it specific allergens, and transitions between seasons are often when people have the hardest time with their allergies. During winter, indoor, rather than outdoor, allergies are usually an issue. As winter turns to spring, grass and tree pollens becomes more abundant, and spores begin being released by outdoor molds. When summer rolls around, grass pollen is problematic, and mold spores peak in warm regions. Ragweed is a common culprit in the fall.
The nature of weather within seasons can affect how bad your allergies are. For example, wet winters enable trees to produce more pollen, which can exacerbate pollen allergies in the following months. Some proponents of theories of global warming claim that climate change is adversely affecting allergy and asthma levels. They point to the dangerous combination of ozone pollution and pollen as sources of increasing numbers of allergy and asthma sufferers.
This year, talk of a “pollen tsunami” has been popular, with the apparent rise in allergic reactions in the northeastern portions of North America. Experts say that rather than releasing pollen at different times, several tree species are releasing pollen simultaneously, leading to a huge level of pollen production that is causing allergies that are more severe than usual. Given the rise in pollen, those allergic to the substance have been recommended to keep their doors and windows closed to shield them from the allergen this year. Reducing the amount of time spent outside also helps reduce allergy symptoms, as does avoiding regions where pollen is particularly prevalent. After coming inside, removing and washing clothes is another good preventative measure during this high pollen time.
Those who suffer allergy symptoms at different times of year often have customized medication plans that include increasing certain medications during the times of year when they tend to experience allergies or when they are traveling to areas where they are likely to be exposed to the allergens that affect them. Antihistamines are often effective interventions to both prevent and manage the symptoms associated with allergies. Doctors also sometimes recommend using saline solution to clean the nose so as to rid air passages of allergens. In the winter, using dehumidifiers and allergen filters can help with indoor allergies, whereas avoiding problematic areas in the outdoors is often effective during spring, summer, and fall. However, specific medications are often useful for specific allergies, and those who suffer from severe allergies are often advised to carry an EpiPen in case of an emergency.
It was once thought that shielding babies from potential allergens would protect them from developing allergies. However, research has begun to show that those babies who are exposed to allergens and complex combinations of allergens early in life tend to be at lower risk for developing allergies than those who are kept in sterile environments. These findings are likely the result of the working of our immune systems. As allergies are our bodies’ way of responding to a substance that the body deems threatening, exposing the body to foreign agents earlier can potentially reduce the likelihood that the body will perceive those agents as threatening in the future and will instead recognize them as innocuous parts of the person’s environment.
Though varying levels of antigens throughout different months of the year is an unavoidable concept, being aware of when and why certain allergens will be more prevalent can allow you to minimize the impact of those allergies on your health and quality of life. Avoiding allergens and engaging in activities to effectively reduce the levels of those allergens in your environment and to minimize the effects of those allergens on your body can make certain seasons and seasonal transitions less stressful and more enjoyable.